<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many permanent migrants came to NZ since 1957? Go on, guess!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.avalonsguide.com/anab/2009/07/how-many-permanent-migrants-came-to-nz-since-1957/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.avalonsguide.com/anab/2009/07/how-many-permanent-migrants-came-to-nz-since-1957/</link>
	<description>There is no &#34;One True Path&#34; to emigrating.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:34:28 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Avalon</title>
		<link>http://www.avalonsguide.com/anab/2009/07/how-many-permanent-migrants-came-to-nz-since-1957/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Avalon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avalonsguide.com/anab/?p=1035#comment-906</guid>
		<description>It does make me wonder just how much Kiwis have spent on the immigration department. I know that I think they are waste of space - but if these numbers really are true - Im not sure that many of the Kiwis I know would be too impressed with the Return on Investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does make me wonder just how much Kiwis have spent on the immigration department. I know that I think they are waste of space &#8211; but if these numbers really are true &#8211; Im not sure that many of the Kiwis I know would be too impressed with the Return on Investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hubby</title>
		<link>http://www.avalonsguide.com/anab/2009/07/how-many-permanent-migrants-came-to-nz-since-1957/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Hubby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avalonsguide.com/anab/?p=1035#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Hi William
I&#039;ve not looked at the Stats for population, I know the StatsNZ population clock is about 4.3m these days, and there was a big deal some years ago when it went past 4m for the first time.  It was only 3.7m at the 2001 census.

I don&#039;t know if the stats would be detailed enough to differentiate between emigrants and &#039;born &amp; bred&#039; Kiwi&#039;s.
Either way, major population growth isn&#039;t through new emigrants.  Although the Stats population clock does estimate a net increase of one person per hour (approx) due to net migration.
=24 per day, =8760 per year ~=438,000 in 50 years..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi William<br />
I&#8217;ve not looked at the Stats for population, I know the StatsNZ population clock is about 4.3m these days, and there was a big deal some years ago when it went past 4m for the first time.  It was only 3.7m at the 2001 census.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if the stats would be detailed enough to differentiate between emigrants and &#8216;born &#038; bred&#8217; Kiwi&#8217;s.<br />
Either way, major population growth isn&#8217;t through new emigrants.  Although the Stats population clock does estimate a net increase of one person per hour (approx) due to net migration.<br />
=24 per day, =8760 per year ~=438,000 in 50 years..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.avalonsguide.com/anab/2009/07/how-many-permanent-migrants-came-to-nz-since-1957/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>William Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avalonsguide.com/anab/?p=1035#comment-901</guid>
		<description>Interesting. 

Have you gone back to check population figures during the same period to see if there are any mistakes anywhere else?

I seem to remember the population was only just over 3milion about 15 years ago and has risen to closer to 4m.

Is that memory incorrect?

If your working is right, it should be put in front of the immigration minister or the Dim Post at least!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. </p>
<p>Have you gone back to check population figures during the same period to see if there are any mistakes anywhere else?</p>
<p>I seem to remember the population was only just over 3milion about 15 years ago and has risen to closer to 4m.</p>
<p>Is that memory incorrect?</p>
<p>If your working is right, it should be put in front of the immigration minister or the Dim Post at least!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheri</title>
		<link>http://www.avalonsguide.com/anab/2009/07/how-many-permanent-migrants-came-to-nz-since-1957/comment-page-1/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avalonsguide.com/anab/?p=1035#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Guessing before I read...200k?
OMG I&#039;m good! That&#039;s averaging 10k people per year 2000-2009, then 5k a year 1970-1990, and the last 20 in years 1950-1970. Just what I &#039;felt&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guessing before I read&#8230;200k?<br />
OMG I&#8217;m good! That&#8217;s averaging 10k people per year 2000-2009, then 5k a year 1970-1990, and the last 20 in years 1950-1970. Just what I &#8216;felt&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

